Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Clinical Nutrition ESPEN ; 48:489, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2003946

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has rapidly spread across the globe. Elderly individuals and patients with comorbidities such as obesity, diabetes, and hypertension have been shown to have a higher risk of hospitalization, severe disease, and mortality.1 To date, little data has been published on the timely identification and correction of undernutrition in patients hospitalised with COVID-19. We previously reported a retrospective analysis of the management and 28-day outcomes of 316 consecutive adult patients with SARS-CoV-2 PCR-confirmed COVID-19 admitted to our centre, within the first wave of the pandemic between 8th January 2020 and 16th April 2020.2 The study was registered as a clinical service evaluation and was exempt from ethical approval. A total of 316 patients (55% male) were identified with a median (IQR) [range] age of 75 (60 – 83) [23 – 101] years. Twenty-seven of 316 (9%) patients were healthcare workers, and 60 (19%) were admitted from a care home. The median (IQR) duration of admission was 8 (4 – 14) days, and 59 (19%) patients were admitted to critical care. In total, 84 (27%) patients died within 28 days of admission (or before discharge where admission duration >28 days). We here present further hitherto unpublished analyses of the nutritional status, intervention and outcomes of this cohort. Gastrointestinal symptoms present at admission were: anorexia (97 [31%]), diarrhoea (64 [20%]), vomiting (43 [14%]) and abdominal pain (33 [10%]). Admission weight was recorded in 151 (48%) patients, with a median [range] 74.5kg [32.4-168.0]. Where measured (62 [20%] patients), there was significant weight loss observed during admission;median (IQR) weight 77.4kg (65.5-96) at admission and 73.7kg (61.4-94.5) last recorded weight on admission (P=0.0001, paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Forty-eight (15%) patients were assessed by a dietitian during their admission. Fifty-three (17%) patients received oral nutritional supplements whilst an inpatient and 38 (12%) received enteral feeding. Of those patients receiving enteral feeding, 30 (79%) had tube placement confirmed by chest x-ray. In conclusion, gastrointestinal symptoms that are commonly associated with reduced nutritional intake were common in these patients hospitalised with COVID-19. There was evidence of reduced nutritional screening on admission compared with pre-COVID practice. This may have been associated with barriers associated with initial infection prevention and control requirements as well as focus on respiratory issues, and should be addressed in future waves of infection. Updated safety advice on enteral tube feeding including confirmation of tube placement was followed in the majority of cases.3 Future studies should aim to better establish the particular circumstances in COVID-19 where nutritional support impacts outcome. 1. Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention 2020 Apr 7;323(13):1239-1242. 2. Baker KF, Hanrath AT, Schim van der Loeff I, Tee SA, Capstick R, Marchitelli G, Li A, Barr A, Eid A, Ahmed S, Bajwa D, Mohammed O, Alderson N, Lendrem C, Lendrem DW, COVID-19 Control Group, COVID-19 Clinical Group, Pareja-Cebrian L, Welch A, Field J, Payne BAI, Taha Y, Price DA, Gibbins C, Schmid ML, Hunter E, Duncan CJA. COVID-19 Management in a UK NHS Foundation Trust with a High Consequence Infectious Diseases Centre: A Retrospective Analysis. Med Sci (2021);9(1):6. 3. Nasogastric tube safety Special Interest Group. May 2020. Enteral tube feeding safety in COVID-19 patients. BAPEN. )

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL